Ooh! I should start doing book reviews whenever I read a book! Which, I'll admit, is infrequently at the moment due to school but will hopefully pick up once summer begins. I'll have to go on a book spree when I get home.
I was gonna make this brief, but what do you know, my inner ranter took the situation hostage.
What: Divergent by Veronica Roth
Divergent is a dystopian teen novel that is basically about a Marxist society in which people are split into different communities (called factions) based on their primary nature to be either kind, brave, intelligent, honest or selfless. When children in the society turn sixteen, they take "aptitude tests" to determine which faction they are best suited for, and then they must decide which faction to choose. If they choose to join a faction that is not the same as that they were raised in, they must be separated from their family and ultimately start a new life with their new faction. Each community serves a different purpose in the functioning of society, but tensions between the communities ultimately lead to political uprising and the beginning of war.
Divergent is the first instalment in the trilogy.
The symbols of the five factions: Dauntless, Erudite, Candor, Abnegation and Amity.
Where: The novel takes place in the future, in the ruins of Chicago. Each faction resides in their own compound, the descriptions of which are somewhat difficult to follow, although perhaps that's just because I sped through the book without much pause over scene descriptions.
Who: The main character is Tris Prior, a plain girl who learns that she has a affinity for multiple factions, which makes her a sort of rebel threat to the government that aims to keep subordination within each faction. She's the narrator of the novel and therefore assumes the kind of fill-in, girl-next-door identity that the adolescent reader can easily slip into. The second-deepest character would have to be Four, Tris's instructor and love interest. He's a bit of an enigma, and his character is unravelled rather well throughout the novel. The rest of the characters include Tris's family, friends, and the leaders of her new faction, all of whom are relatively unexplored, at least in this first novel.
Themes: Obviously the novel has undercurrents of social commentary on ideas of utopian societies and the role of government in the lives of people. The setup of Roth's post-apocalyptic world seems to be one of organized peace, but of course, such cooperation cannot exist for long. The people of the "selfless" faction are chosen to rule the nation, or whatever you would call it, since they are believed to have the best interests of all at heart. However, these "selfless" people shun luxury and economic prosperity, leading to conflicts with the more materialistic factions. The society therefore proves that it was created with the best of intentions, but the darkness of human nature (lust, greed, the need for power) will ultimately destroy the goodness that it is in a constant battle with.
Why I Read It: As I said in a previous post, I don't really read teen novels anymore because although they may be enjoyable, I just find them much too superficial and simple for me. However, I plan on seeing the movie that comes out next year, so I thought I might as well read the book. It looked interesting enough.
Comments: This novel is a carbon copy of The Hunger Games, and I'm not saying this lightly. From the uneven political power to the splitting of society into polarizing segments to the practical-tomboy-and-strong-though-she-doesn't-admit-it heroine to the rebel uprising to the teen romance (I don't want to spoil it, but let's just say that things go very much the same way as the Peeta/Katniss saga), it is practically the exact same story. I know this is probably completely coincidental (I usually come up with great, seemingly original ideas and only then find out that it's been done a hundred times before me), but it's still a little unfortunate. At least in the case of The Hunger Games and Twilight, they were completely different. Now, what with the Divergent movie and all, I'm a little nervous about how it will be perceived.
The only major difference for me was that The Hunger Games sucked you into the story more (and I'm not that biased by adolescent opinion, since I only read The Hunger Games a year and a half ago) and was more eloquently written. I feel as though Divergent had a lot of potential that was left unexplored, both thematically and in its prose. The storytelling is simplistic and very "tell" instead of "show," which I suppose is to be expected from a young adult novel, but it was still disappointing in that regard. However, I didn't find The Hunger Games to be that much better; I desperately wish that it had been written as an adult novel so that the political and social themes could have been more deeply explored, instead of glazed over with action and lukewarm romance. The romance in Divergent was a little more traditional, but I feel as though everything was skimmed over. The book was decently lengthy, yet I still came out of it feeling as though I just had a summary of the actual story. None of the other characters are examined except for Tris and Four, and seem to serve no other purpose than simply to fill up the space. Hopefully this changes as the series progresses, as there are two more books in which the secondary characters can be filled out.
The book makes for a fairly compelling read, despite of or perhaps because of its simplicity; it's definitely a quick read. The "skimming" aspect of it still rings true, though; almost all of the action and suspense is blazed through so that you barely get a chance for it to sink in before the conflict is resolved. It isn't torturous to read because of this, but it also doesn't allow you to fully experience the impact of what's going on in the plot, since it's all over too fast.
I'm sure the film will make for a cool visual representation, since there are quite a few adrenaline-pumping scenes.
(Source: IMDb)
Four is particularly likeable and intriguing. He's not typically kind or charming or daring; the darkness and flaws within him are not blatant but are not deeply covered, either. He seems to be the realest person of all in the story, considering that he is private when it comes to personal questions and allows different aspects of his personality to shine through at different moments. He isn't just representative of a set of characteristics by which he can be defined, and that's quite nice.
I'm trying to imagine Divergent without the context of The Hunger Games, and it's tough. However, the setting of the book is well-suited, and the plot is nicely paced, if not a little brief.
Dislikes: Like I said, it's way too similar to The Hunger Games. It's also too simple for my liking and too on-the-surface. I feel as though so much more could have been done with different elements of the story, such as when the characters must face their fears to become part of the "brave" faction. There was inner conflict, but it was not to-the-core. Every traumatic event in the novel was overcome much too easily, which makes it unrealistic. But then again, maybe I'm just expecting too much out of a book that was written for 13 year olds.
Overall Opinion: Divergent was a fun read, and not a total waste of time. I still prefer The Hunger Games, although I suppose I'll have to read the rest of the Divergent series to find out if things improve, as they very well may. It's quick and to-the-point with some pretty cool and daring scenes, and I find the romance to be a nice plot point amidst everything else going on. All I can really say is not to get your hopes up too high, as I think I did. I've definitely read better young adult novels, and ones that are more suspenseful yet less action-based. It would make for a good summer read, but perhaps is not the best choice for your English Lit Masters thesis.
I could write a Masters thesis on Miles Teller's face, though.
